Attorneys are cautioning employers to maintain workplace COVID-19 protections including masking and social-distancing requirements despite states’ moves to loosen or drop their pandemic regulations, saying federal policy on the pandemic has become a “moving target” with enforcement still likely in response to larger outbreaks.
November 15, 2026
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia will hear oral argument April 4 in labor groups’ bid to reinstate OSHA’s COVID-19 emergency temporary standard (ETS) for the healthcare sector, setting the stage for what could be a precedent-setting decision on whether the agency has authority -- or even a duty -- to extend such emergency regulations.
Date:
OSHA has released a new regulatory interpretation letter outlining its test for when a worker's injuries in a traffic accident are considered “work-related” and subject to the agency’s recordkeeping and reporting requirements, warning employers that injuries sustained outside of a “normal commute” are recordable.
Date:
Oregon’s worker safety agency has released its long-awaited proposal for a permanent heat illness prevention standard as part of a broader state effort to mitigate the impacts of climate change that also includes a workplace standard for wildfire smoke exposure, just as OSHA is conducting its own outreach for a nationwide heat stress rulemaking.
Date:
Former Department of Labor (DOL) officials are urging a federal appeals court to reverse a district judge’s ruling limiting the circumstances where worker can sue OSHA for failing to take action on an “imminent danger,” saying the decision wrongly interprets the statute and could lead to “irremediable intra-Departmental conflicts.”
Date:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is convening a three-judge “merits” panel to consider unions’ lawsuit seeking an order that would force OSHA to reinstate its COVID-19 emergency temporary standard (ETS) for healthcare workers and quickly release a permanent rule, in a potential sign that the court is taking the case seriously.
Date:
A new federal circuit court ruling appears to set a more demanding standard for OSHA to show that an employer could “reasonably foresee” worker misconduct, in a decision that aims to clarify a “confusing patchwork” of precedent on where the burden of proof lies in cases dealing with the adequacy of an employer’s safety program.
Date:
Workers at a Pennsylvania meat-packing plant are asking a federal appeals court to take up their potentially precedent-setting suit against OSHA over its failure to cite their employer for what they say were inadequate COVID-19 protections, arguing that the case remains relevant over a year after they first brought the claims.
Date:
Worker safety advocates and Democratic state attorneys are pushing OSHA to adopt a broad, environmental-justice focused heat stress standard that would require employers to adopt dual environmental and physiological heat monitoring programs, comprehensive mitigation methods and new recordkeeping requirements.
Date:
Katherine Lemos, chair of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB), said at a recent meeting that she would delay votes on “the mounting number of recommendations” before the board until its two new members who won Senate confirmation in December are formally sworn in -- a step she said could come as soon as this week.
Date: